MNQ Bollinger: which timeframe is most reliable?
Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 — Bollinger prediction accuracy on each timeframe, measured.
| Timeframe | Confidence | Position | Directional |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Minute | 55.2% | 72.3% | 98.0% |
| 5-Minute | 52.3% | 79.5% | 98.0% |
| 10-Minute | 49.4% | 63.3% | 98.0% |
| 15-Minute | 57.8% | 79.5% | 98.0% |
| 30-Minute | 43.4% | 62.6% | 98.0% |
| 45-Minute | 49.2% | 75.3% | 98.0% |
| 1-Hour | 47.6% | 73.2% | 93.3% |
Measured outcomes, refreshed through the session.
On directional accuracy the strongest of these is 1-Minute at 98.0%. A slower frame usually sets context while a faster one decides timing, so the most accurate frame is not always the one to trade.
How to read this
Directional accuracy is how often the projected direction proved right; position accuracy is how closely the projected path tracked what actually happened. Confidence is LiveCharts.AI's own read. The live prediction itself is generated inside the platform.
See the live predictions — 7-day free trialSee live predictions on LiveCharts.AI →
LiveCharts.AI disclaimer: trading involves risk of substantial loss and is not suitable for every investor. LiveCharts.AI provides technical analysis tools and AI-generated predictions for educational and informational purposes only; outcomes vary and individual results may differ from any examples shown. Historical performance is not indicative of future outcomes. Only invest capital you can afford to lose and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.