LiveCharts.AICompare › 45-Minute EMA

45-Minute EMA: which instruments read best?

EMA forecast accuracy on the 45-minute chart, compared across every instrument.

InstrumentConfidencePositionDirectional
CL47.7%64.7%98.0%
ES59.3%81.2%98.0%
ETHUSD46.8%55.9%98.0%
GC51.1%66.8%98.0%
MBT58.2%55.1%83.3%
MCL47.3%64.6%98.0%
MES61.8%82.4%98.0%
MET52.4%67.6%96.7%
MGC51.2%67.0%98.0%
MNG47.8%62.5%98.0%
MNQ54.0%72.4%98.0%
MYM48.3%61.4%98.0%
NG45.6%59.6%98.0%
NQ57.5%74.6%98.0%
SI52.5%71.6%98.0%
SIL56.4%74.2%98.0%
YM49.8%59.7%98.0%
Measured outcomes, refreshed through the session.

On directional accuracy the strongest of these is CL at 98.0%. Instruments differ in how cleanly they trend, so the same reading is not equally informative on all of them.

LiveCharts.AI showing a completed trade setup with entry, stop and target, and the AI's reasoning beside the chart

How to read this

Directional accuracy is how often the projected direction proved right; position accuracy is how closely the projected path tracked what actually happened. Confidence is LiveCharts.AI's own read. The live forecast itself is generated inside the platform.

See the live forecasts — 7-day free trial

See live predictions on LiveCharts.AI →

LiveCharts.AI disclaimer: trading involves risk of substantial loss and is not suitable for every investor. LiveCharts.AI provides technical analysis tools and AI-generated forecasts for educational and informational purposes only; outcomes vary and individual results may differ from any examples shown. Historical performance is not indicative of future outcomes. Only invest capital you can afford to lose and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.