EMA forecast accuracy on the 45-minute chart, compared across every instrument.
| Instrument | Confidence | Position | Directional |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 47.7% | 64.7% | 98.0% |
| ES | 59.3% | 81.2% | 98.0% |
| ETHUSD | 46.8% | 55.9% | 98.0% |
| GC | 51.1% | 66.8% | 98.0% |
| MBT | 58.2% | 55.1% | 83.3% |
| MCL | 47.3% | 64.6% | 98.0% |
| MES | 61.8% | 82.4% | 98.0% |
| MET | 52.4% | 67.6% | 96.7% |
| MGC | 51.2% | 67.0% | 98.0% |
| MNG | 47.8% | 62.5% | 98.0% |
| MNQ | 54.0% | 72.4% | 98.0% |
| MYM | 48.3% | 61.4% | 98.0% |
| NG | 45.6% | 59.6% | 98.0% |
| NQ | 57.5% | 74.6% | 98.0% |
| SI | 52.5% | 71.6% | 98.0% |
| SIL | 56.4% | 74.2% | 98.0% |
| YM | 49.8% | 59.7% | 98.0% |
On directional accuracy the strongest of these is CL at 98.0%. Instruments differ in how cleanly they trend, so the same reading is not equally informative on all of them.

Directional accuracy is how often the projected direction proved right; position accuracy is how closely the projected path tracked what actually happened. Confidence is LiveCharts.AI's own read. The live forecast itself is generated inside the platform.
See the live forecasts — 7-day free trialSee live predictions on LiveCharts.AI →