Parabolic SAR prediction accuracy on the 1-hour chart, compared across every instrument.
| Instrument | Confidence | Position | Directional |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6E | 57.3% | 85.5% | 50.0% |
| BTCUSD | 55.6% | 77.2% | 56.7% |
| CL | 51.8% | 66.1% | 36.7% |
| ES | 49.7% | 68.4% | 63.3% |
| ETHUSD | 50.8% | 65.6% | 53.3% |
| GC | 54.0% | 72.1% | 98.0% |
| M6E | 57.6% | 85.9% | 46.7% |
| MES | 50.7% | 70.1% | 63.3% |
| MGC | 54.8% | 73.2% | 98.0% |
| MNQ | 50.7% | 71.4% | 98.0% |
| MYM | 58.3% | 80.1% | 98.0% |
| NQ | 52.5% | 73.4% | 98.0% |
| SI | 53.5% | 72.1% | 98.0% |
| SIL | 55.8% | 77.5% | 98.0% |
| YM | 60.5% | 82.9% | 98.0% |
| ZN | 52.1% | 48.5% | 98.0% |
On directional accuracy the strongest of these is GC at 98.0%. Instruments differ in how cleanly they trend, so the same reading is not equally informative on all of them.

Directional accuracy is how often the projected direction proved right; position accuracy is how closely the projected path tracked what actually happened. Confidence is LiveCharts.AI's own read. The live prediction itself is generated inside the platform.
See the live predictions — 7-day free trialSee live predictions on LiveCharts.AI →